When Fairness Equals Savage Cuts
Wednesday, 7 July 2010
Every LibDem candidate across the country campaigned on “fairness” during the Election.
Every letter and leaflet promised that the LibDems were the only party who would restore economic and social fairness. Locally, Danny Alexander promised fair taxes, a fairer economy – with investment in the Highlands in green energy , broadband and affordable house building - and a fair fuel deal for rural motorists.
Labour’s warning about LibDem plans for savage cuts in public spending were dismissed as scare mongering.
Two months on and the LibDems need to answer some questions.
How is it fair to raise the income tax threshold, then take it all away again for low income families by raising VAT and slashing tax credits?
Why is it now fair for public sector workers to take the pain, instead of the bankers and financiers you lambasted in all your election literature?
What’s happened to all the promises of reducing rural fuel costs? The VAT increase next January will put rural fuel prices up not down and a pilot scheme to reduce rural fuel prices seems to have been kicked into the coalition long grass. See Peter Peacock’s latest comments here.
Why is Danny Alexander leading the charge to cut not just 25% but as much as 40% from government budgets? The Barnet Formulae will bring that home to Scotland next year. If times are already tough for Highland Council he is about to make it a whole load worse.
Labour would have had to make some tough decisions about public spending, but our approach was to get the balance right between reducing spending and raising income from economic growth as we came steadily out of recession. We would have reduced the deficit by 50% by 2014 without any of the ideologically driven pain now driven by the Tories and signed up to by the LibDems.
How is all this “Standing up for the Highlands”, Danny?
0 comments:
Post a Comment