LibDems leaders follow the Tory line again on Syria.

I wrote to all the Highland Media this week, calling Danny Alexander to account for his support for the Government motion which would have taken us down to road to a full scale war in Syria.  Events since have shown how wise the House of Commons was to reject the motion, with the real prospect now of a negotiated outcome.  Here is the text of my letter.

Dear Sirs

Danny Alexander’s decision to actively support the government motion on Syria as described in the media this week (Inverness Courier, 3^rd September 2013), shows the full extent of his political transformation since first being elected by the voters of Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey.

At the 2005 General Election, Mr Alexander owed much of his success in being elected to replace David Stewart, to a campaign based on the Liberal Democrat Party’s opposition to the war in Iraq.

Now Danny Alexander is “disappointed” that he - along with Clegg, Cameron and Osborne - could not persuade the House of Commons to start down the same road again in Syria. 

Readers of your paper will recall the vote in Parliament in March 2003 - opposed by every single Lib Dem MP - which gave approval to go to war in Iraq.  Many of the arguments made then by Tony Blair as are being made again now by David Cameron and echoed by Danny Alexander.  The UK entered into a disastrous and bloody war from which we have only recently emerged.  To this day, there is no clear benefit to the people of the country we were supposed to be trying to help with hundreds of thousands of people killed and injured in the resulting civil war.

In 2010, when I stood against him as the Labour candidate, I was constantly attacked as representing the party which had taken the UK into an illegal war in the middle-east.  This despite my well known public opposition to the decision to invade Iraq in 2003, alongside my then MP, Gavin Strang.

The Government motion defeated at Westminster last week risked embroiling the UK in a complex middle-east conflict in support of an American-led action with no clear aims or out-comes and with dubious legal justification without clear United Nations backing.

How Danny Alexander can justify his support for the Government now, when he opposed just such a decision ten year ago and at both elections since is beyond me.   

Labour’s amendment recognised the atrocity of the use of chemical weapons but would have put in place a process which ensured backing for any action under international law.  The Government chose not to support this and press on with its case for immediate action.  Labour was right to vote against the Coalition motion when the amendment was rejected and I am proud of my party and its principled leader for doing so.